Live translation for distributed teams

Four people, four languages, everyone speaking, nobody waiting. That is a different problem from a conference — and it is the one the large platforms are not solving, because their customer is the event.

Why the native tooling struggles here

Google Meet supports one language pair per meeting, English-anchored. A team with Polish, Spanish and German speakers cannot use it — an architectural limit, not a pricing one.
Teams Interpreter does not work in ad hoc meetings, covers 10 languages, and requires Microsoft 365 Copilot rather than Teams Premium — roughly three times the cost most teams budget for. External contractors are excluded entirely.
Zoom translates to captions only. Reading captions while trying to contribute to a fast discussion leaves people passive.

What actually helps

Before buying anything, the free changes usually do more: decisions in writing, channel translation on, meetings recorded with transcripts, agendas circulated in advance. Live translation earns its cost in one place — the meetings where discussion happens. Design debates, retrospectives, planning. Not status updates, which should be written.

What we offer

Symmetric conversation, not one speaker into many passive listeners
No per-language tariff — a four-language call is not four times the price
Credits that never expire, which matters when usage is irregular
Published pricing, no sales call

When you should not choose us

If your team is two languages with English on one side, everyone is internal and licensed, and calls run under 90 minutes, Google Meet already does this and it is included in what you pay. Use it. If you need twelve active participants, we cap at four and you should look elsewhere rather than work around it.

Where to start

Try it on a real call — no contract, no minimum.